If adrenochrome is not real, then how come...

Yahoo! News and a few other legacy media blogs have been screeching an awful lot lately about Passion of the Christ has-been star — the guy who played Jesus Christ (Jim Caviezel is his name, says IMDB), not Mel Gibson, who produced and directed the 2004 crucifixion re-enactment conservative cult hit — the actor recently went off script when he discussed the possibility (real, in his view) that Hollywood elites engage in “adrenochroming”.

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas film adaptation — the ‘adrenochrome vial’ scene that Yahoo! and other debunkers don’t like to mention. One of many pop culture references to adrenochrome, say researchers, that mainstream outlets are intentionally or o…

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas film adaptation — the ‘adrenochrome vial’ scene that Yahoo! and other debunkers don’t like to mention. One of many pop culture references to adrenochrome, say researchers, that mainstream outlets are intentionally or out of ignorance failing to address.

An oddly specific rebuttal article making the rounds seems to exhibit total conviction that adrenochrome is alt-right clickbait fever dream, and nothing more. The article’s mere existence, and homepage featuring on Yahoo!, raised concern with some i…

An oddly specific rebuttal article making the rounds seems to exhibit total conviction that adrenochrome is alt-right clickbait fever dream, and nothing more. The article’s mere existence, and homepage featuring on Yahoo!, raised concern with some in the truth community.

Now, I don’t know where I stand on an issue this frankly disturbing. I’ve never done adrenochrome, and I don’t know anyone who has personally, which is saying something statistically speaking: in a large bevy of strange sources I can call upon from my journalism days, there simply aren’t people out there familiar with this one, unless it is truly a secret kept in only the most rarified circles of society imaginable…

What I will say, however, is that where there is smoke, there is often fire in this late-stage empire collapse phase of our bizarre corporate media blitzkriegers. When they go after something with sudden total zeal, I always wonder: is this screeching coming from a place of righteously calling out a grave error of some kind, or is it elite gaslighting of the most callous kind?

And on the topic of adrenochrome, a few lingering questions that Yahoo!’s article conveniently completely sidesteps:

  1. Why did famed journalist (and friend of Johnny Depp) Hunter S. Thompson write of adrenochrome’s use amongst the American political/financial elite, and why did adrenochrome even feature briefly in the film adaptation of his book, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas? (Shown while holding up a vial of a liquid and swiftly flicking his tongue like a snake.)

  2. Why did a prominent occult message board have a posting by someone who claimed to have ingested adrenochrome — a thread with many replies and lots of engagement, posted more than a decade before the current outcropping of adrenochrome chatter from today’s online truth community?

  3. In the highly verboten and scrubbed from the Internet Podesta WikiLeaks emails, what is “walnut sauce,” and what is “walnut saucing”? Is walnut saucing, as some researchers believe, a slang or code word reference to adrenochroming? Why were DC elites connected to Hillary Clinton emailing each other about walnut sauce recipes, without ever attaching or including a recipe of any kind in their email correspondence?

  4. Why did WikiLeaks begin tweeting about “spiritcooking” references in the Podesta WikiLeaks just days before their founder was politically targeted, and later arrested & thrown into solitary confinement?

  5. Why did Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s wife have a sister who reportedly worked at Cannibal Club Los Angeles? (A restaurant that purports to offer human flesh and/or human adrenal gland extracts to its guests, based on menus uploaded online by independent researchers.)

Screenshot

Again, I don’t have a clear opinion on this one, but I find the heavy-handed sudden debunker articles from Yahoo!, The New York Times and elsewhere to be a bit odd, especially in light of the fact that none of these confidently written articles address any of the 5 curious points mentioned above.